![]() In both chapters, the writer chooses the community over individuality. In some situations, choosing community over individuality because it could be saving a bigger harm in the community that we are living in. For my point of view, sometimes, we have to make some sacrifice for a greater cause. In this chapter, when the news was spread out about the disease it caused the war in between communities and the people with the access to vaccine chose to show their power and people with the power of the vaccine made a decision based on their gender and age that will be more beneficial for them. Which couldve to result in a big cease in the community? But on the other hand, it was an injustice for that individual who was already infected by this disease because they had no clue on how to save themselves from this harmful disease.įurthermore, In chapter 3 Great Panic, it shows that sometimes you have to sacrifice to save a community over one individual. that was one of the hard decision needed to be done because the panic over other diseases which was new to the people and they had no clue on how dangerous the disease could be. Can you imagine the damage it would have done to that administrations political capital (Brooks 60). In my opinion, choosing a community over individuality could be seen as a good thing, but at the same time, it could injustice toward individual who might face circumstances of the situation. In another example, CIA decision to keep the true danger hidden it might save many lives, it gave them time to create a vaccine to save many people from that disease. But, on the other hand, it cost lots of individuals who were not prepared for the danger they were in. In a way is a good thing because they ended up saving a lot of people live by choosing not to create danger in the community. In this situation, CIA chose to save the community by not saving the real danger, but it might be very dangerous to an individual who might be processing a regular life might face a danger. For Example, In chapter 2 CIA chose to cover the real reasoning of many people died who were killed by Zombies to keep the community goes under a panic. During the Crisis, In these kinds of scenarios people usually sacrifice as an individual greater cost to save a community or a group. This essay Id prefer to discuss Individual Vs Community which is having toward a group of people rather than an individual. Mary’s Miller, unlike, has been accused of similar to herself and all the Americans as risky for such informal and tender attacks. As Grover Carlson, the White House has confirmed that this problem may be calm and he was trying to keep the community safe. ![]() Breckinridge Scott is seen as a greedy and bad person who is prepared the counterfeit vaccine to give people harm and wants to get enough money from them. General Travis D Ambrosia defeated the intelligence and accepts the possibility of shifting the army, He controls it, and well he let other people know how to become a military officer. ![]() Additionally, Bob Archer explained that China’s privacy deceives the CIA because of there the loss of intelligence resources. Claiming that the large Health and Safety sweeps they were creating were the part of the dissident crackdown and not the good well-being circumstance. also, everyone blamed CIA for non expecting conflict. ![]() In chapter 2 the role of Bob Archer to indicates the CIA couldnt stop the Zombie War they are just given hopes to people in China. Get your custom essay onĪfter seeing, the situation of both chapters care-based strategy plays an important role to promote the ideas and let the reader make decisions between Individual Vs Community dilemma. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |